and so.
i was thinking of going to this party out in the city tonight, but then i called up a friend that i wanted to go with and he wasn't home. the party ends at around two am, so i figured it's kinda late to be just heading out now. i would get to the party around an hour from now, probably later than that, actually. not much time to get into any kind of groove...
then i got to thinking about what my real reasons were for not going to the party. thinking about that annoying "what if" that nags me every so often, i thought, "what if my friend was home and said 'sure, lets go'"? would i have gone? pondering that idea for a minute, i thought to myself, "probably so". i think that most likely i would have gone, if only for the sake of having company while out.
but then i thought to myself that this is actually a limitation. applying the idea to the various other parts of my personality and 'self' that i
could have made contigent upon the presence of a friend [or otherwise co-conspirator], i realized that:
many of the things that make me who i am are things that i have done alone.
in other words, if i had decided to be accompanied by friends when making the decisions that led me to my current state of mind and body, i would not be who i am. examples:
i most likely would not be a martial artist,
  i would probably be supporting a
psychological addiction to weed or ecstasy,
i would probably be lazy,
  i would probably have a couple of STDs by now,
etcetera etcetera.
on the other hand...
i would probably be more
socially well-adjusted. but then, i think i'd probably be a mean drunk...
  i would probably have more sex than i do now,
        i would probably be either in-the-closet or homophobic,
i would probably be a jaded raver-boy and take "the scene" way too seriously,
  i would probably have decided that the way of the world is right, i.e. --
                marriage is good,
                having my "shit together" would be a looming priority,
                my parents are right because of their immense "life experience",
                being safe is more important that being alive,
                having children and a "family" is my duty in life.
and so on.
the mind turns back to the original concept. who would i be if i depended on my friends for my sense of identity?
my answer is that most likely i would be a very different person. i think that to an extent, i have chosen a path for myself in life... kind of an individualistic path... not very communally driven. actually no, by definition, as a human being, i am part of a society. to say otherwise would be for me to lie to myself. but having considered that, i also think that i am more inclined to observe the workings of society from the standpoint of learning than of participating. i think the development of that outlook has been as much the product of the social environs that i grew up in as much as a conscious choice that i made over the years. isolation was an unfortunate consequence, one that became a lifestyle choice. but more about that another time.
the idea that i arrived at through my musings was that there are two things that having a friend present could do for me:
a. psychological support- having another person that i know to be a "friend" with me has the aspect of reinforcing my sense of self-importance -- self-esteem in the face of society. indeed, to an extent, i believe that it only takes two individuals to create a society between themselves.
b. physical safety- the old fallacy of strength in numbers.
i see the idea of psychological reinforcement as a weakness of the mind; an individual is no stronger when he/she has someone to agree with their point of view than if he/she were standing alone. mob consciousness emerges from the desire to be one among many -- it is easier to be agreed with than it is to use your own mind to form an intelligent opinion, particularly if standing alone is the result.
illusion=something that cannot be empirically proven
delusion=the desire to believe in an illusion
feeling comforted by having someone nod their head at your worldview seems to be more delusion than truth to me.
and the idea of physical safety has some truth to it, but it seems more sensible to just steer clear of situations that seem potentially inflammatory... find a place with a good vibe and everyone will be better off for it. if trouble follows you anyway, deal with it and move on.
so then -- the next time i want to go out and party, if i don't have any friends who can/want to go with me, i will just go myself, and make new friends when i get where i'm going. even so, it is important to keep in mind that what i find beautiful and inspirational is just that; the presence of others is a lucky coincidence and a happy one at that. but nothing more.
or am i just fooling myself?
aha ha... crazy bastard i am.